Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 JUNE 2014

Algarin v. Maybelline: Survey Evidence Of Purchaser Behavior Defeats Class Certification

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

A decision by a California federal judge highlights the important role that expert testimony and evidence can play in defeating a bid for class certification.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A recent decision by a California federal judge highlights the important role that expert testimony and evidence can play in defeating a bid for class certification. On May 12, 2014, Judge Anthony Battaglia of the Southern District of California denied a motion for class certification in a lawsuit challenging Maybelline's allegedly false and deceptive advertising regarding its SuperStay 24-hour lipcolor and skin foundation products. Algarin v. Maybelline LLC, Case No. 12cv3000 AJB (DHB). The plaintiffs alleged that they paid a premium for Maybelline's products, which purportedly did not last for 24 hours as promised, and that the company's representations would deceive the reasonable consumer.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from