Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 OCTOBER 2025

A Seat At The Table: Third Parties And Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses

A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Contributor

A&O Shearman

Introducing A&O Shearman Unparalleled global depth for a changing world. Today more than ever,...

View firm profile
Explore more from A&O Shearman

The High Court has looked at when a third party can rely on (and be bound by) an exclusive English jurisdiction clause in Campeau v Gottex.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The High Court has looked at when a third party can rely on (and be bound by) an exclusive English jurisdiction clause in Campeau v Gottex.

Director seeks to enforce third party rights

The case concerned a sale and purchase agreement with an exclusive English jurisdiction clause and which granted an indemnity to a director not party to the agreement.

The seller, Gottex, brought claims in Luxembourg alleging fraud and negligence by Mr Campeau which, it said, had caused the sale to be undervalued. As well as objecting to jurisdiction in those proceedings, Mr Campeau served English proceedings, out of the jurisdiction, to enforce his third party rights. The seller applied in England to set aside service on the basis that Mr Campeau could not rely on a jurisdiction clause in an agreement to which he was not party.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from