Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 SEPTEMBER 2017

A Guide To ESI Preservation Responsibilities 2017

Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Explore more from Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP

The litigation-related duty to preserve relevant evidence, which extends to both electronic and hard copy materials, is well established and widely known in the legal community and the business world.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The litigation-related duty to preserve relevant evidence, which extends to both electronic and hard copy materials, is well established and widely known in the legal community and the business world. Despite broad familiarity with this obligation, many corporate litigants continue to be subjected to severe sanctions due to judicial intolerance for the failure to preserve electronically stored information (ESI). While some such sanctions involve the imposition of legal fees, in many instances courts have issued severe adverse jury instructions, effectively destroying a litigant's chance of prevailing or waging an effective defense.

In today's legal climate, a company's seemingly innocent delay in implementing an appropriate method and taking "reasonable steps" to preserve ESI may be highly problematic. The duty to preserve relevant evidence, including ESI, remains too important to ignore, not only for those individuals engaged in litigation on a daily basis but also

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from