Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 AUGUST 2011

8/31 D.C. Circuit Majority Holds Supreme Court Decision

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

D.C. Circuit Majority Holds That, There Being No New Cause of Action Created by Alient Tort Statue, No Claim Exists Against U.S. Officials Individually, Whereas, Says the Dissent, a Cause of Action in the U.S. Would Exist Against Non-U.S. Officials for the Same Conduct

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

D.C. Circuit Majority Holds That, There Being No New Cause of Action Created by Alient Tort Statue, No Claim Exists Against U.S. Officials Individually, Whereas, Says the Dissent, a Cause of Action in the U.S. Would Exist Against Non-U.S. Officials for the Same Conduct

Akran Mohammed Ali, et al. v. Rumsfeld, et al., No. 07-5178 (D.C.Cir. June 2011) (consol), is the appeal of an action by non-U.S. residents or citizens captured, held, and allegedly tortured by U.S. milatary personnel. This decision affirms the District Court's grant of a motion to dismiss Alient Tort Statute (ATS), 28 U.S.C. sec 1350, and constitutional claims.

The rulings here of interest to international commerical or business litigation (which includ claims asserting torts, even if not torture) include the following:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from