Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 AUGUST 2014

7th Circuit Rejects Public-Disclosure Bar In Qui Tam Case

A cardinal rule of a qui tam action brought under the False Claims Act is that the relator must be the information’s original source.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A cardinal rule of a qui tam action brought under the False Claims Act is that the relator must be the information's original source.

In United States ex rel. Heath v. Wisconsin Bell, Inc., No. 12-3383 (7th Cir. July 28, 2014), the Seventh Circuit grappled with this bar on the use of publicly disclosed information, refusing to apply it in a case involving the amounts Wisconsin Bell charged to Wisconsin school districts for phone service. (The Affordable Care Act modified this rule somewhat, but the change was not retroactive, so the court applied the law that was in effect before the Affordable Care Act became law.)

Certain Wisconsin school districts employed the relator, Heath, to audit their telecommunications bills. Understanding why requires a brief explanation of the Education Rate Program. The program is a federal subsidy created by the Telecommunications Act of 1996. It subsidizes telecommunication services for qualifying school districts, but it requires

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from