Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 SEPTEMBER 2020

Precedential No. 32: TTAB Strikes Untimely Supplemental Expert Report

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Contributor
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Wolf, Greenfield is one of the 10 largest law firms in the United States devoted exclusively to...

View firm profile
Explore more from Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

In this 23-year old proceeding involving the mark COHIBA for cigars, the Board rejected a supplemental expert report submitted by respondent on the same day as its pretrial disclosures.

United StatesIntellectual Property

In this 23-year old proceeding involving the mark COHIBA for cigars, the Board rejected a supplemental expert report submitted by respondent on the same day as its pretrial disclosures. The Board first found that the Supplemental Report did not make the original expert report complete or accurate, but instead was an improper attempt to bolster the expert's original opinions with new examples and illustrations. Then, applying the Great Seats factors, the Board found that the untimely disclosure of the Supplemental Report was not substantially justified or harmless. Empresa Cubana Del Tabaco d.b.a Cubatabaco v. General Cigar Co., Inc., Cancellation No. 92025859 (August 26, 2020) [precedential].

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from