Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 JUNE 2024

Pitfalls In Current Terminal Disclaimer Practice And Additional Problems For Patentees And Stakeholders In Proposed Changes

In the prosecution of a patent application before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), under certain instances, an examiner can issue a nonstatutory obviousness-type...

United StatesIntellectual Property

In the prosecution of a patent application before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), under certain instances, an examiner can issue a nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting rejection (ODP rejection) based on the claims of another reference patent or application. When facing such an ODP rejection, the filing of a terminal disclaimer in the application being prosecuted as to the reference patent or application is one avenue of overcoming the rejection.

In a terminal disclaimer, the patent applicant is agreeing that the patent issuing from the application being prosecuted will have the expiration date of the reference patent or a patent issuing from the reference application (if the ODP rejection is based on a pending application).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Disclaimer: This Alert has been prepared and published for informational purposes only and is not offered, nor should be construed, as legal advice. For more information, please see the firm's full disclaimer.

See more popular content from