Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 MAY 2022

Patent Case Summaries | Week Ending April 22, 2022

A weekly summary of the precedential patent-related opinions issued by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the opinions designated precedential or informative by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

United StatesIntellectual Property

A weekly summary of the precedential patent-related opinions issued by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the opinions designated precedential or informative by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.


Apple Inc. v. Zipit Wireless, Inc., No. 2021-1760 (Fed. Cir. (N.D. Cal.) Apr. 18, 2022). Opinion by Stoll, joined by Hughes and Mayer.

Between 2013 and 2016, Zipit (located in South Carolina) and Apple (located in California) communicated about two Zipit patents directed to wireless instant messaging devices. Their communications included telephone calls, letters, emails, and in-person meetings at Apple's California headquarters. Zipit contended that Apple infringed the patents and should purchase or license them, and Apple contended that it did not infringe and that the patents are invalid.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from