Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JUNE 2020

Non-Infringement Need Not "Be Actually Litigated" To Invoke Kessler Doctrine

The patents at issue, referred to as the "True Name" patents, are directed to systems creating a substantially unique identifier for each data item through the use of hash functions.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Addressing the issue of claim preclusion, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's holding that patent infringement customer lawsuits were precluded in view of a prior action against a website proprietor that was dismissed with prejudice and involved the same patents and accused product. In re: PersonalWeb Techs, LLC, Case No. 19-1918 (Fed. Cir. June 17, 2020) (Bryson, J.).

The patents at issue, referred to as the "True Name" patents, are directed to systems creating a substantially unique identifier for each data item through the use of hash functions. In 2011, PersonalWeb sued Amazon and one of Amazon's customers, Dropbox, for patent infringement in the Eastern District of Texas based on use and sale of the Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3). After the district court issued its claim construction order, PersonalWeb stipulated to the dismissal of all claims against Amazon with prejudice. PersonalWeb had previously dismissed

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from