Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 FEBRUARY 2020

IPRs Cannot Be Used To Challenge Patents For Indefiniteness

Weintraub Tobin Chediak Coleman Grodin Law Corporation
Explore more from Weintraub Tobin Chediak Coleman Grodin Law Corporation

There are a number of requirements that must be met for an invention to be patentable. The invention must be novel (unique) and nonobvious...

United StatesIntellectual Property
Audrey A. Millemann
Audrey A. Millemann

There are a number of requirements that must be met for an invention to be patentable. The invention must be novel (unique) and nonobvious (i.e., a person skilled in the field of the invention would not have found the invention obvious based on the existing knowledge in the field). In addition, the patent application must meet other requirements, including written description (the application must contain a detailed, clear, and definite written description of the invention) and enablement (the application must describe how to make and use the invention). If the patent application satisfies all of the requirements, a patent is issued.

A third party can challenge an issued patent on several different grounds, either in litigation or in the Patent and Trademark Office's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). If the challenge is successful, some or all of the patent's claims will be invalidated. If only some of the claims are invalidated, those claims will be canceled

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from