Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 AUGUST 2011

IP Update, Vol. 14, No. 7, July 2011- Part 1

In a case involving "black-box" jury forms, issues of post-"KSR" obviousness, damages and willfulness, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the jury verdict as to validity, damages and willfulness, but reversed and remanded the district court’s refusal to award enhanced damages or attorneys’ fees.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Edited by Paul Devinsky and Rita Weeks

Patents

  • Read, Not Seagate, Controls Enhanced Damages
  • This (Retractable) Needle Is Going to Sting a Bit: Next Chapter in the Adventures of Post-Phillips Claim Construction
  • Therasense Inequitable Conduct Guidelines Explained
  • Is the Claimed Stent Described in the Specification?
  • New Dosage of a Known Pharmaceutical: Obvious?
  • Going Down: Means-Plus-Function Elements on Claims to Elevator Invention Are Structural
  • Mutual Indemnification Clause Gives Rise to Attorneys' Fees Regardless of Prevailing Party
  • Customer Letter Characterizing Competitor's Patent as Invalid Not Enough to Create Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction

Cert Alerts

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from