Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JUNE 2025

First Denial Based On USPTO's New Discretionary Denial Factors

K&L Gates
K&L Gates
Contributor
K&L Gates

K&L Gates

The Firm K&L Gates is an integrated, international law firm. As a single global law firm, truly...

View firm profile
Explore more from K&L Gates

Earlier this year, Chief Judge Boalick issued guidance on the USPTO's recission of "Interim Procedure for Discretionary Denials in AIA Post-Grant Proceedings...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Earlier this year, Chief Judge Boalick issued guidance on the USPTO's recission of "Interim Procedure for Discretionary Denials in AIA Post-Grant Proceedings with Parallel District Court Litigation," explaining how the Fintiv factors should be addressed going forward. Shortly after, Acting Director Stewart issued a memorandum titled "Interim Processes for PTAB Workload Management" that provided additional non-Fintiv discretionary factors that should be assessed to determine whether discretionary denial of an IPR petition is appropriate.

Since the memorandum's release, there have been 11 decisions involving requests for discretionary denial; seven requests have been granted and four have been denied.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from