Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 JUNE 2026

Federal Circuit Finds Jury Instructions In ED Texas Case “Erroneous” And “Improper”

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

Dyk, J. The Federal Circuit, over a dissent by Judge Prost, reversed a jury determination of trade secret misappropriation on statute of limitations grounds. Insulet Corp.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Precedential and Key Federal Circuit Opinions

1. Insulet Corp. v. EOFlow, Co. Ltd., (25-1807, 5/28/2026) (Dyk, Prost, Reyna)

Dyk, J.  The Federal Circuit, over a dissent by Judge Prost, reversed a jury determination of trade secret misappropriation on statute of limitations grounds.  Insulet Corp. (“Insulet”) sued EOFlow, Co. Ltd., EOFlow, Inc. and its chief executive Jesse Kim (collectively “EOFlow”) for trade secret misappropriation under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”) and for patent infringement.  Insulet’s claims stemmed from EOFlow’s hiring of several former Insulet employees to work on EOFlow’s insulin patch pump; these employees had previously worked on Insulet’s insulin patch pump.  The claims went to trial, and a jury found that EOFlow misappropriated Insulet’s trade secrets.  The patent claims, which had been bifurcated from the trade secret claims, were dismissed without prejudice after the trial. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from