Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 MARCH 2025

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: February 2025

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Contributor
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP is one of the world’s largest firms focusing on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP

This is part of a series of articles discussing recent orders of interest issued in patent cases by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

United StatesIntellectual Property

This is part of a series of articles discussing recent orders of interest issued in patent cases by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

In Insulet Corporation v. EOFlow, Co. Ltd. et al No. 1.23-cv-11780, Chief Judge Saylor entered a stipulated Consent Permanent Injunction as to Plaintiff and certain individual Defendants.

This injunction permanently prohibits those Defendants from using or assisting others in using Plaintiff's trade secrets, mandates the return or destruction of related documents, and requires those Defendants to demand the return and destruction of such trade secrets by third parties to whom they may have been disclosed. It also grants Plaintiff audit rights to verify compliance. The Court retained jurisdiction.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from