Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JUNE 2022

Considerations Of Copyright And First Amendment Rights In Appropriation Art

Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Explore more from Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP

There is a consensus that Andy Warhol originated the saying, "Art is anything you can get away with." However, further research shows that Warhol may have borrowed that quote...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Case study of The Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith litigation.

There is a consensus that Andy Warhol originated the saying, "Art is anything you can get away with." However, further research shows that Warhol may have borrowed that quote from Canada's media theory philosopher Marshall McLuhan.

This year, the United States Supreme Court will address the question, as some may be tempted to say, of exactly what Andy Warhol can get away with when it decides whether Warhol's use of Lynn Goldsmith's photograph of the American singer-songwriter Prince Rogers Nelson (Prince) in his silkscreen Prince Series was transformative and therefore not an infringement on Goldsmith's copyright. More sinister potential implications of this forthcoming decision of the High Court are (1) who should decide on the merits and meaning of works of art, and (2) what prior restraints on artistic speech are the courts now comfortable with?

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from