Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 JANUARY 2024

Alexa: What Is Plain And Ordinary Meaning?

Axinn
Axinn
Contributor
Axinn

Axinn

Incisive. Inclusive. Invested. We’re Axinn. Experienced, tenacious, and always trial-ready, we are...

View firm profile
Explore more from Axinn

Is "milk" an item, or just a word? This question, among others, is set to be answered on January 12, 2024, as Freshub Inc. (Freshub) and Amazon.com...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Is “milk” an item, or just a word? This question, among others, is set to be answered on January 12, 2024, as Freshub Inc. (Freshub) and Amazon.com, Inc. (Amazon) argue before the Federal Circuit (Nos. 22-1391, 2022-1425). A jury found that Amazon's Alexa Devices do not infringe Freshub's voice recognition patents. The key issue on appeal is the proper roles of the parties and the district court at trial when infringement turns on the meaning of a claim term that has not been construed. Must a party object to expert testimony about claim meaning or request claim construction in order to challenge an adverse jury verdict? And, is it error for a court to allow a jury to resolve the dispute based on expert testimony regarding the term's meaning in view of its use in the patent?

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from