Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 SEPTEMBER 2014

Indalex v. National Union: Another Win For Policyholders In Construction Cases

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the petition for allowance of appeal filed by National Union of the Superior Court’s decision in Indalex Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.

United StatesInsurance

On September 18, 2014, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court rejected the petition for allowance of appeal filed by National Union of the Superior Court's decision in Indalex Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh PA, 83 A.3d 418, 421 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013).  As set out in an earlier posting, the Superior Court in Indalex distinguished, and therefore limited, earlier holdings to the effect that faulty workmanship claims do not constitute an occurrence under standard-form commercial general liability ("CGL") policies and therefore are not covered.

Had the Pennsylvania Supreme Court been of the view that the Superior Court's opinion in Indalex was wrong or inconsistent with Pennsylvania law, it is safe to assume that it would have agreed to hear the case, particularly given the somewhat inconsistent earlier opinions on this issue by various Pennsylvania courts (including the Supreme Court itself).  The Supreme Court's declination to hear the appeal thus

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from