Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 APRIL 2026

Good-Faith Dispute On Coverage Shields Insurer From Chapter 93A Exposure

Greenberg Traurig
Greenberg Traurig
Contributor
Greenberg Traurig

Greenberg Traurig

Greenberg Traurig, LLP has approximately 3,200 lawyers across 51 locations in the United States,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Greenberg Traurig

In Vineyard Aircraft Hangers Inc. v. New Hampshire Insurance Company, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts reaffirmed the distinction between a wrongful coverage denial...

United StatesInsurance

In Vineyard Aircraft Hangers Inc. v. New Hampshire Insurance Company, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts reaffirmed the distinction between a wrongful coverage denial and conduct that rises to the level of a Chapter 93A violation. The dispute arose from the denial of coverage under an insurance policy for damage to an aircraft sustained while taxiing out of an aircraft hangar, with the parties contesting the applicability of a policy exclusion.

Although the court found that the insurer breached its duty to defend due to an ambiguous exclusion, it rejected the plaintiff’s Chapter 93A claim. Liability under Chapter 93A, Section 11 requires more than an incorrect coverage position. Instead, a party must present evidence of bad-faith conduct, coercion, or other unscrupulous conduct.  Here, the insurer’s denial rested on a plausible, good-faith interpretation of an admittedly ambiguous provision, and the dispute reflected a legitimate difference of opinion

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from