Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JUNE 2026

Delaware Delivers Another "Bump-Up Exclusion" Win To D&O Policyholders

K&L Gates
K&L Gates
Contributor
K&L Gates

K&L Gates

The Firm K&L Gates is an integrated, international law firm. As a single global law firm, truly...

View firm profile
Explore more from K&L Gates

Recent court decisions in Delaware and New Jersey have delivered significant victories for policyholders in disputes over D&O insurance coverage and construction defect claims.

United StatesInsurance

Earlier this year, the Delaware Supreme Court delivered the latest win for policyholders in a string of battles regarding so-called “Bump-Up Exclusions” in directors and officers (D&O) liability insurance policies. The ruling carries lessons in this fiercely contested area.

Disputes over Bump-Up Exclusions have been heavily litigated in recent years, as we have detailed in our treatise, the Policyholder’s Guide to the Law of Insurance Coverage (§ 11.06[D][5]). The wordings of these exclusions vary, but in general they purport to preclude coverage for settlements that effectively increase the allegedly inadequate price or consideration that was paid to acquire an entity. In Illinois National Insurance Co. v. Harman International Industries, Inc., Delaware’s high court considered a version that excluded, in relevant part, “any amount of any judgment or settlement representing the amount by which such price or consideration is effectively increased.”1

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from