Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 JULY 2013

An Owner Is Ensnared By A Subguard Program

Duane Morris LLP
Duane Morris LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Duane Morris LLP

In a recent appellate decision in New York, a developer sued its construction manager for fraudulent misrepresentation that the construction manager had obtained full Subguard coverage.

United StatesInsurance

In a recent appellate decision in New York, a developer sued its construction manager for fraudulent misrepresentation that the construction manager had obtained full Subguard" coverage [subcontractor default insurance or "SDI"] to protect developer against default by the largest subcontractor – concrete superstructure – on a Manhattan hi-rise project.  The developer alleged it relied on defendant's representation and suffered damages when the subcontractor defaulted and there was no SDI for the default. 

The court affirmed the trial court's dismissal of the complaint because (1) the developer was not an insured under the SDI policy (only contractors are named insureds under such SDI policies), thus it could not claim damages under the policy even if it had been in place, (2) the failure of the construction manager to perform a contract duty cannot be transformed into a tort by merely alleging a fraud of its performance, (3) the construction manager had no "special

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from