Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 MARCH 2015

Section 328 And Its 'Two-Way Ratchet'

Duane Morris LLP
Duane Morris LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Duane Morris LLP

With this in mind, the court then turned its attention on whether the fee enhancement requested by the committee's professionals should be approved.

United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

In the recent decision in the In re FAH Liquidating (f/k/a Fisker Automotive Holdings), No. 13-13087 (KG) (Bankr. D. Del. Jan. 21, 2015), case, the court addressed whether professionals retained by the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors were entitled to receive a fee enhancement in addition to their normal hourly rate. Fisker is by now well-known among practitioners, as it garnered significant attention last year when the court limited the rights of an assignee of a secured creditor to credit bid pursuant to Section 363(k) of the Bankruptcy Code.

In Fisker, the committee's professionals sought in excess of 50 percent over and above their incurred professional fees as fee enhancements for their work in the case. While the court stated that it did not intend to "minimize its respect for the professionals' work," the court found that the requested fee enhancements, if allowed, would result in excessive compensation; as such, the court denied the request.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from