Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 MARCH 2014

Proceed With Caution When Foreclosing In Washington State: Split Decisions Regarding Deficiency Claims

Duane Morris LLP
Duane Morris LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Duane Morris LLP

Last week, the Washington Court of Appeals, Division One, ruled that, notwithstanding the anti-deficiency provision in the state's Deeds of Trust Act, a lender can pursue a deficiency judgment against a guarantor following a non-judicial foreclosure of the property securing the underlying borrower's obligation.

United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Last week, the Washington Court of Appeals, Division One, ruled that, notwithstanding the anti-deficiency provision in the state's Deeds of Trust Act, a lender can pursue a deficiency judgment against a guarantor following a non-judicial foreclosure of the property securing the underlying borrower's obligation. The decision, Washington Federal v. Gentry, Case No. 70004-9-I, 2014 Wash. App. LEXIS 379 (Wash. Ct. App. Feb. 18, 2014), comes in the wake of a contrary decision by the Washington Court of Appeals, Division Two, less than three months ago. This Division One decision appears to be a triumph for lenders and creates a split among the divisions of the Washington Court of Appeals that may warrant consideration of the issue by the Washington Supreme Court.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from