Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JANUARY 2012

Fifth Circuit Expands Documents Applicable To Determining Claim Preservation

Duane Morris LLP
Duane Morris LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Duane Morris LLP

In a matter of apparent first impression, in Spicer v. Laguna Madre Oil & Gas II LLC (In re Texas Wyoming Drilling Inc.), the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held in an opinion dated July 21 that it was permissible to consider both a plan of reorganization and its accompanying disclosure statement when determining whether a debtor had sufficiently preserved certain causes of action pursuant to § 1123 of the Bankruptcy Code.

United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

This article originally appeared in The Legal Intelligencer and is republished with permission from law.com

In a matter of apparent first impression, in Spicer v. Laguna Madre Oil & Gas II LLC (In re Texas Wyoming Drilling Inc.), the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held in an opinion dated July 21 that it was permissible to consider both a plan of reorganization and its accompanying disclosure statement when determining whether a debtor had sufficiently preserved certain causes of action pursuant to § 1123 of the Bankruptcy Code.

In Spicer, a dispute arose concerning whether Texas Wyoming Drilling Inc. (the debtor) had standing to prosecute certain claims against Laguna Madre Oil & Gas II LLC. Following approval of the debtor's disclosure statement and a few months after confirmation of the debtor's plan, the debtor commenced suits against various former shareholders, including Laguna, seeking to avoid and recover as constructively fraudulent transfers certain

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from