Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 JULY 2026

Oversight Risks Behind Closed Doors: Preparing For Congressional Transcribed Interviews

With the 2026 midterm elections on the horizon and potential shifts in congressional control, organizations face heightened exposure to a powerful but often overlooked oversight tool: the transcribed interview. As committees increasingly target private sector executives, contractors, and consultants for behind-closed-doors questioning, understanding the mechanics, risks, and strategic considerations of these proceedings has become essential for any entity anticipating congressional scrutiny.

United StatesGovernment, Public Sector

As the 2026 midterm elections approach, companies and organizations are wise to assess how a change in control of one or both chambers of Congress could impact their exposure to congressional oversight. If Democrats secure committee gavels, many observers are advising private parties to anticipate a flurry of document subpoenas and high-profile oversight hearings. But there is another key oversight tool that Congress is likely to deploy that is receiving less attention: the transcribed interview, commonly referred to on Capitol Hill as a “TI.”

Historically, congressional investigators typically pursue transcribed interviews with current or former federal officials. But in recent years, committees have increasingly sought TIs of non-governmental actors, including executives, government contractors, consultants, and researchers, who may have information relevant to a congressional investigation. In short, any organization that expects to receive increased oversight scrutiny in the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from