Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 MAY 2024

A Bigger Backyard For CFIUS? Part II: From "National Security" To "Economic Security"

Linklaters LLP
Linklaters LLP
Contributor
Linklaters LLP

Linklaters LLP

As a leading global law firm, Linklaters aims to build relationships that last. Major companies and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Linklaters LLP

What is the proper scope for a "national security" review? Throughout CFIUS's history, commentators and practitioners have debated...

United StatesGovernment, Public Sector

What is the proper scope for a "national security" review? Throughout CFIUS's history, commentators and practitioners have debated the shifting and unclear limits of what the term means, between those who argued for a narrow conception tied largely to defense production, and a broader conception that further considers "economic security." The recently proposed Protecting Against Foreign Adversary Investments Act of 2024 (PAFAIA) sides firmly with the latter. In the first post of this two-part series, we discussed PAFAIA and its effects on CFIUS's real estate jurisdiction. Here, we examine how PAFAIA would formally charge CFIUS with reviewing economic effects, reversing how CFIUS analysis has traditionally been understood. We also comment on PAFAIA's foray into the interplay between CFIUS and burgeoning state-level foreign investment laws and PAFAIA's prospects in Congress.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from