Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 JUNE 2019

SIFMA Urges MSRB To Take No Action On CUSIP Requirements

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

SIFMA called on the MSRB to take no action on Rule G-34 ("CUSIP Numbers, New Issue and Market Information Requirements") and to leave the 2017 amendments in place.

United StatesFinance and Banking

SIFMA called on the MSRB to take no action on Rule G-34 ("CUSIP Numbers, New Issue and Market Information Requirements") and to leave the 2017 amendments in place. As previously covered, the MSRB requested comments on the "CUSIP Requirement," which obligates municipal advisors assisting issuers in the "competitive sale of a new issue of municipal securities to apply for the assignment of a CUSIP number . . . within a specified time frame."

In a comment letter, SIFMA said it is surprising that Rule G-34 is under review only eight months after the 2017 G-34 amendments became effective. According to SIFMA, the MSRB should leave Rule G-34 as is, since the MSRB considered most of the questions raised when it assessed the 2017 G-34 amendments themselves. With respect to the competitive public offerings of notes, SIFMA suggested the MSRB should consider providing limited relief to municipal advisers by requiring the winning underwriter to obtain the CUSIP.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from