Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 APRIL 2017

CCP Risk Profiles Are Unique, Say Chicago Fed Analysts

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago ("Chicago Fed") published a staff policy paper highlighting the major business model and risk profile differences between central counterparties ("CCPs") and banks.

United StatesFinance and Banking

The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago ("Chicago Fed") published a staff policy paper highlighting the major business model and risk profile differences between central counterparties ("CCPs") and banks. In the paper, titled " A CCP is a CCP is a CCP," Chicago Fed staffers Robert Cox and Robert Steigerwald explain how collateral and capital play different roles in CCP risk management when compared with banks, calling capital "subordinate, yet complementary" in CCP risk management.

The authors emphasized that CCPs (unlike banks) are not in the "business of risk-taking." "CCPs are managers of risk, not takers of risk," they said. The authors assert that central clearing transforms risk instead of eliminating it, and that the role of the CCP is to (i) manage the related credit, liquidity and operational risks, (ii) provide a mechanism for "market entry and exit that supports liquidity" and (iii) ensure clearing members meet all CCP-mandated obligations.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from