Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 MARCH 2022

US EPA Administrator Regan Previews Strategy For The Power Sector In A Post-Clean Power Plan World

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

Numerous stakeholders are anxiously awaiting the decision from the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al., No. 20-153, on whether and how EPA can regulate carbon emissions from power plants.

United StatesEnvironment

Numerous stakeholders are anxiously awaiting the decision from the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al., No. 20-153, on whether and how EPA can regulate carbon emissions from power plants. Based on oral argument in late February, the prevailing view is that the Court is likely to rule against EPA and constrain—at least to some degree—EPA's authority under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act, which allows EPA to regulate certain air pollutants (including greenhouse gas emissions) from existing stationary sources. Whether the Court rules narrowly based on specific issues of statutory interpretation, or issues a broader decision invoking the "major questions" doctrine, remains to be seen with a decision expected by June.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from