Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 NOVEMBER 2020

Trump Rollbacks Hit A New Snag: Incidental Take Of Migratory Birds

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

It is not only a sin to kill a mockingbird, it is also a crime," proclaimed U.S. District Court Judge Valerie Caproni, channeling Harper Lee.

United StatesEnvironment

It is not only a sin to kill a mockingbird, it is also a crime," proclaimed U.S. District Court Judge Valerie Caproni, channeling Harper Lee. On August 11, Caproni vacated the "M-Opinion" authored by Interior Solicitor Daniel Jorjani. The opinion embodies the administration's attempt to reverse the Department of the Interior's interpretation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act as prohibiting incidental, or non-purposeful, "take" of migratory birds. The administration is also expected to release a final rule codifying this policy this fall. As with so many other regulatory rollbacks, the fate of these efforts will likely depend on the outcome of the election.

Under the MBTA, "it shall be unlawful at any time, by any means or in any manner, to pursue, hunt, take, capture, kill, attempt to take, capture, or kill, possess . . . any migratory bird." Interior previously interpreted this language to prohibit not only intentional take (e.g., hunting and poaching), but also

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from