Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 JUNE 2025

Related Lawsuits In Separate Countries Reflect Different Approach To Climate Litigation

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

Often, climate change lawsuits allege claims under constitutional provisions, human rights laws, or environmental statutes and regulations.

United StatesEnvironment

Often, climate change lawsuits allege claims under constitutional provisions, human rights laws, or environmental statutes and regulations. Lawsuits filed in separate countries by Energy Transfer ("ET") and Greenpeace International ("GPI") related to the Dakota Access Pipeline—an underground crude oil pipeline stretching from North Dakota to Illinois—take a different approach that could be used by others in future litigation correlated with climate change issues. The backdrop for the dispute initially stems from allegations of GPI's defamatory statements about the pipeline and GPI's support of allegedly illegal acts by participants in high-profile protests along the pipeline route in 2016-2017. ET claimed that GPI orchestrated and financially supported criminal conduct by its affiliated activists and groups, including harassment of ET employees, trespass, and destruction of property.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from