Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 AUGUST 2023

The 6th Circuit Clarifies Retaliation Under The FMLA

Dickinson Wright PLLC
Dickinson Wright PLLC
Contributor
Dickinson Wright PLLC

Dickinson Wright PLLC

Dickinson Wright is a full-service law firm with more than 550 lawyers, serving clients across the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Dickinson Wright PLLC

On January 25, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that an employee's notice of need for leave, regardless of whether the employee was ultimately entitled to the leave...

United StatesEmployment and HR

On January 25, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that an employee's notice of need for leave, regardless of whether the employee was ultimately entitled to the leave, was protected conduct under the Family and Medical Leave Act ("FMLA"). Milmen v. Fieger & Fieger, P.C., No. 21-2685 (6th Cir. Jan. 25, 2023). Accordingly, an employee has a claim for retaliation under the FMLA if an adverse action is taken against them because they requested leave, even if they are not entitled to that leave under the FMLA.

Background

Plaintiff, an employee of Fieger & Fieger (the "Firm"), made a request for unpaid leave to care for her two-year-old son and was terminated. The child had a history of respiratory illness and was experiencing symptoms resembling Covid 19.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from