Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JUNE 2004

Tax Issues in Employment Settlements

Steptoe LLP
Steptoe LLP
Contributor
Steptoe LLP

Steptoe LLP

Steptoe International (UK) LLP has built a strong reputation for providing top-quality regulatory,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Steptoe LLP

or the parties negotiate a settlement before a j udgment is rendered. The parties also may negotiate a settlement after a judgment is rendered in order to avoid the appeals process. This outline focuses primarily on the tax issues of employment-related settlements. Nevertheless, the manner in which an employmentrelated dispute is settled has little, if any, significance for federal tax purposes.

United StatesEmployment and HR
Patrick Derdenger
Patrick Derdenger
Randal Evans
Randal Evans

Originally published in 2001

I. INTRODUCTION

Employment-related disputes are usually resolved in one of two ways. Either the case proceeds to judgment, or the parties negotiate a settlement before a j udgment is rendered. The parties also may negotiate a settlement after a judgment is rendered in order to avoid the appeals process. This outline focuses primarily on the tax issues of employment-related settlements. Nevertheless, the manner in which an employmentrelated dispute is settled has little, if any, significance for federal tax purposes. See Longino Est. v. Comm'r, 32 T.C. 904 (1959) (settlement); Levens v. Comm'r, 10 T.C.M. 1083 (1951) (arbitration award). Thus, the tax rules relating to settlement payments remain the same if the dispute proceeds to judgment.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from