Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 APRIL 2026

Plaintiffs Pursue New Strategy Focused On Climate Risk In ERISA Fee Litigation

Baker Botts L.L.P.
Baker Botts L.L.P.
Contributor
Baker Botts L.L.P.

Baker Botts L.L.P.

Baker Botts is a leading international law firm with 11 offices located in the US, Europe, and the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Baker Botts L.L.P.

ERISA fee litigation focused on alleged investment underperformance has been active for many years. In Kvek v. Cushman & Wakefield, Case No. 2:26-cv-736 (W.D. Wash., filed March 3, 2026), plaintiffs have taken a new tack, alleging that one fund underperformed due to investments in companies impacted by climate risk and that plan fiduciaries breached their duties by failing to analyze and account for such risk.

United StatesEmployment and HR

ERISA fee litigation focused on alleged investment underperformance has been active for many years. In Kvek v. Cushman & Wakefield, Case No. 2:26-cv-736 (W.D. Wash., filed March 3, 2026), plaintiffs have taken a new tack, alleging that one fund underperformed due to investments in companies impacted by climate risk and that plan fiduciaries breached their duties by failing to analyze and account for such risk. The recently filed complaint in Kvek is the first of what may be a new trend in ERISA fee litigation, and it remains to be seen how courts will rule on these claims. This update discusses the climate-risk allegations, challenges we see with plaintiffs’ approach, and tips for fiduciaries.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from