Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JUNE 2018

No Ongoing Administration, No ERISA Plan

Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Contributor
Proskauer Rose LLP

Proskauer Rose LLP

Firm Overview Proskauer is an elite global law firm with more than 900 lawyers across key financial...

View firm profile
Explore more from Proskauer Rose LLP

As such, the Court affirmed the lower court's ruling dismissing the case.

United StatesEmployment and HR

Participants in a voluntary separation program filed suit for breach of fiduciary duty under ERISA seeking additional benefits after learning that greater benefits were provided to individuals who did not participate in the program but were later part of an involuntary reduction-in-force.  The Third Circuit concluded that the program was not an ERISA plan because there was no ongoing administration.  More specifically, the Court determined that the program was only available for approximately two months and only required the employer to make an initial, discretionary determination of applicants' eligibility for the program, calculate certain one-time payments, and, in some cases, determine whether the applicant was eligible to work part-time for a defined period or subsequently be re-hired.  As such, the Court affirmed the lower court's ruling dismissing the case.  The case is Girardot v. The Chemours Company, No. 17-1894, 2018 WL 2017914 (3rd Cir. Apr. 30, 2018).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from