Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 NOVEMBER 2020

Lit Alerts—November 2020

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

In Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. George Washington University, the US District Court for the District of Columbia held that Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d)

United StatesEmployment and HR

Privilege: District Court Rules Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) Cannot Be Used To Compel Production of Potentially Privileged Documents Prior To Privilege Review

In Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. George Washington University, the US District Court for the District of Columbia held that Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) orders cannot be used to force a responding party to produce potentially privileged documents without the opportunity to first review them.

The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed a discrimination lawsuit against The George Washington University, on behalf of Sara Williams, a former executive assistant to the university's athletic director. The EEOC alleged Williams was treated less favorably than a male comparator by being paid less for equal work and denied employment opportunities and advancement. A discovery dispute arose from four EEOC requests for production of documents served on the university—three seeking

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from