Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 APRIL 2023

Lit Alerts—March 2023

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed partial summary judgment for an employer in a putative class action, holding paid time off (PTO) is a "fringe benefit"...

United StatesEmployment and HR

Employment: Paid Time Off Is Not Part of an Employee's Salary, Third Circuit Holds

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed partial summary judgment for an employer in a putative class action, holding paid time off (PTO) is a "fringe benefit" rather than part of an employee's salary under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. In Higgins v. Bayada Home Health Care Inc., Bayada, a home healthcare company, employed the plaintiffs as salaried employees, meaning they were not entitled to overtime pay under the FLSA. However, Bayada also required employees to meet a weekly productivity quota, and if they failed to meet that quota, Bayada would deduct time from the employee's available PTO to make up for the difference between time worked and the quota.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from