Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 AUGUST 2012

"Hybrid" Wage And Hour Class Actions Approved By Third Circuit

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
Explore more from Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart

Employers have raised numerous challenges to hybrid actions over the years but have had limited success in most jurisdictions.

United StatesEmployment and HR

On March 27, 2012, a unanimous three-judge panel of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Knepper v. Rite Aid, Inc. reversing the district court's ruling that the plaintiffs could not pursue state wage and hour claims as a Rule 23 class action alongside parallel Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) collective action claims. The decision makes the Third Circuit one of five federal appellate courts to reject employers' arguments against this practice, and it paves the way for plaintiffs to continue to pursue such hybrid actions in the future.

Under § 216(b) of the FLSA, an employee can only become a party to an FLSA action if "he gives his consent in writing to become such a party and such consent is filed in the court in which such action is brought." Accordingly, claims under the FLSA cannot be pursued as opt-out class actions under Rule 23. However, plaintiffs frequently file "hybrid" actions that combine claims under state wage and hour laws, which can b

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from