Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 FEBRUARY 2012

Ex Parte TRO's: Courts Don't Like Them

Every now and then, non-compete and trade secret plaintiffs conclude that the need for relief is so urgent that a temporary restraining order is not enough.

United StatesEmployment and HR

Every now and then, non-compete and trade secret plaintiffs conclude that the need for relief is so urgent that a temporary restraining order is not enough. Instead, they decide that relief must be granted by the court before notice and an opportunity to be heard is provided to the defendant. This practice, which is legally known as seeking relief ex parte, is permitted by courts, but subject to a specific showing of need that is discussed in greater detail below. A recent decision by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas illustrates that courts are loathe to grant ex parte injunctions.

To be clear, non-compete and trade secret cases are emergency driven. From a plaintiff's perspective, the defendant's wrongful conduct threatens irreparable harm. To prevent such harm, plaintiffs seek injunctive relief by way of (1) a temporary restraining order ("TRO"), and/or (2) a preliminary injunction. A TRO is simply an expedited, temporary form of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from