Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 JUNE 2018

White Collar Roundup - June 2018

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in United States v. Kolsuz, held that a forensic search of a cellphone during a border crossing didn't require a warrant under the Fourth Amendment.

United StatesCriminal Law

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in United States v. Kolsuz, held that a forensic search of a cellphone during a border crossing didn't require a warrant under the Fourth Amendment. In the case, Hamza Kolsuz, from whom border officers had previously confiscated unlicensed firearm parts during attempted border crossings, was detained at Dulles airport when attempting to travel to Turkey. The officers again seized firearm parts, detained Kolsuz, and manually searched his iPhone, which was not password protected. The officers then arrested Kolsuz and took the phone to the Homeland Security Investigations office, where computer forensic agents attached the phone to a data extractor and downloaded its contents for later review. Kolsuz moved to suppress, arguing that the search and seizure were not covered by the border search exception and that the more stringent rules pertaining to searches incident to arrest governed. The district court disagreed, and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from