Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 AUGUST 2024

Loper Bright, Jarkesy, And Implications For The SEC

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Much of the discussion of Loper Bright has focused on its historic overturning of precedent, but the opinion is actually a rejection of the concept of ambiguity that underpinned Chevron.

United StatesCriminal Law

"Chevron is overruled," Chief Justice Roberts wrote in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, because "[t]he deference that Chevron requires of courts reviewing agency action cannot be squared with the [Administrative Procedure Act of 1946 (APA)]." The decision – described by Justice Gorsuch, concurring, as placing a "tombstone" on Chevron – was released the day after SEC v. Jarkesy, which prohibits the SEC from requiring the adjudication of fraud cases in which civil penalties are sought before Administrative Law Judges (ALJs). While Loper Bright's rejection of Chevron is likely to have a significant impact across federal agencies, the SEC has already largely implemented the changes required by Jarkesy. Both decisions evidence the Court's trend toward limiting the regulatory power of agencies including by minimizing the role of agency expertise in the evaluation and enforcement of regulations.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from