Just days before a potentially landscape-altering hearing in a
Miami federal courtroom at which lawyers were going to be forced to
testify about the legal advice they had given their clients during
the course of an internal investigation, the parties quietly backed
into their own corners and the hearing was cancelled.
But the close call should send shivers down the back of company
counsel conducting internal investigations of potential Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) violations, especially as they and
their outside advisers consider whether and how to participate in
the Department of Justice's (DOJ) formalised FCPA enforcement
policy.
The policy requires voluntary disclosure to and fulsome
cooperation with DOJ prosecutors in exchange for a much sought
after declination of prosecution. The costs of this new policy,
however, are likely to be steep as illustrated by the court's
decision in Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Herrera (2017),
in which a federal magistrate judge