Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 MARCH 2026

Shareholder Proposal Litigation Increases Following The SEC's Revised Rule 14a-8 Process

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

Since the SEC stopped substantively responding to Rule 14a-8 no-action requests, shareholders are increasingly turning to litigation to challenge the exclusion of their proposals from company proxy materials.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

Once comparatively rare, shareholder proposal litigation has proliferated since the SEC's November 2025 announcement that it would no longer provide substantive responses to most Rule 14a-8 no-action requests. In the last month alone, shareholders have filed five lawsuits challenging the exclusion of their proposals under the SEC's revised process. By comparison, there were fewer than 30 such lawsuits in the previous 50 years.

Settled

  • New York City Employees' Retirement System v. AT&T Inc. was filed on February 17, 2026, in the Southern District of New York, challenging AT&T's exclusion of an EEO-1 workforce diversity disclosure proposal on "ordinary business" grounds. AT&T settled nine days later by agreeing to include the proposal in its proxy materials.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from