Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 MAY 2026

Recent Shareholder Proposal Litigation Underscores The Need For Shareholder Proposal Reform

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

Recent federal court decisions on shareholder proposals reveal fundamental tensions in applying Rule 14a-8's "ordinary business" exclusion, with three cases reaching seemingly different conclusions despite using the same legal framework. These divergent outcomes expose the rule's inherent ambiguity and may accelerate the SEC's anticipated reform or rescission of the shareholder proposal regime.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

In Short

The Situation: Since the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced in November 2025 that it would no longer rule on most Rule 14a-8 no-action requests, companies have taken varying approaches to shareholder proposals that continued to be pressed by social mission organizations, public employee unions, retirement systems, and others across the political spectrum. Some added the proposals to their proxy materials, some declined. Six proponents filed suit against companies, arguing that their proposals were improperly excluded.

The Result: While half of the six lawsuits settled, the other half resulted in court decisions that turned on the "ordinary business" exclusion under Rule 14a-8(i)(7)—but with seemingly divergent outcomes.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from