Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 JUNE 2019

M&A 101: Back To Basics

Akin
Akin
Contributor
Akin

Akin

Akin is a global law firm with more than 1,100 lawyers and advisors who pride themselves on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Akin

Sellers and buyers in M&A transactions necessarily have conflicting interests and a natural desire to minimize their risks.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

Sellers and buyers in M&A transactions necessarily have conflicting interests and a natural desire to minimize their risks. These issues are among those that must be negotiated and resolved in most acquisitions of a private company target.

Transaction Structure

arly on, parties must decide whether to structure the deal as a merger, a stock sale or asset sale. That decision is usually driven by 1. tax considerations, 2. equity holder-approval requirements and 3. the desired risk allocation. Generally, an asset purchase may allow a buyer to cherry-pick assets and leave behind unwanted liabilities with the seller, but there remains the possibility of successor liability and a negotiated asset purchase agreement may leave seller holding more post-closing liability than an equity purchase agreement.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from