Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JUNE 2020

Loans Aren't Securities

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

On May 22, in Kirschner v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., the SDNY applied the "family resemblance test" articulated by the Supreme Court in Reves v. Ernst & Young to conclude that...

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

On May 22, in Kirschner v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., the SDNY applied the “family resemblance test” articulated by the Supreme Court in Reves v. Ernst & Young to conclude that syndicated loans were not securities for securities law purposes. (For a detailed discussion, see our Clients & Friends memo.) This decision helps shed light on the tax law applicable to foreigners that invest in primary market debt.

The IRS asserts that regularly making loans to the public (either directly or through an agent or partnership) is a U.S. trade or business that can subject a foreigner to U.S. tax. By contrast, the tax code provides that purchasing and selling “securities” on the secondary market is not a U.S. trade or business (the securities trading safe harbor), and the tax regulations define securities to include any “evidence of indebtedness.”

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from