Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JANUARY 2020

Firm Settles FINRA Charges For Inaccurately Coding Options Orders

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader
Contributor
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is a global law firm trusted by clients to deliver on complex, high-stakes...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hogan Lovells Cadwalader

A firm settled FINRA charges for inaccurately coding options orders submitted by customers on the firm's online trading platform.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

A firm settled FINRA charges for inaccurately coding options orders submitted by customers on the firm's online trading platform.

The alleged failures resulted in a violation of FINRA Rule 3110 ("Supervision"), among other securities regulations. FINRA Rule 3110 requires broker-dealers to establish, maintain and enforce both supervisory systems and written supervisory procedures reasonably designed to supervise broker-dealers' activities and the activities of their representatives.

According to the Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent, the firm routed to options exchanges orders that were marked as "Customer" rather than as "Professional Customer." This resulted in the execution of approximately 500,000 mismarked options orders. FINRA alleged that the miscoding (i) led to inaccurate order records and (ii) potentially caused "those orders to be given undue priority for execution on the options exchanges." FINRA determined that the firm failed to implement (i)

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from