Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 APRIL 2016

A Lofty Concept: Disclosure Effectiveness

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

In addition to requesting comment on various specific line items of Regulation S-K, as we note below, the Concept Release poses some fundamental questions regarding disclosure matters.

United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law

Even before the JOBS Act had been proposed, policymakers focused on the downturn in the number of initial public offerings (IPOs) speculated that the burdensome disclosure requirements applicable to public companies were deterring private companies from undertaking public offerings. A number of market participants, including even a few then-Commissioners of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"), noted that the disclosures contained in IPO prospectuses, as well as those contained in Securities Exchange Act ("Exchange Act") filings, had consistently become longer in recent years. Then-Commissioner Paredes noted that disclosure overload brought with it the possibility that investors might no longer be able to identify the information that was material to an investment decision amidst pages of generic or repetitive text. In an effort to jumpstart the IPO market and reduce the regulatory burdens for IPO candidates, Title I of the JOBS Act (the "IPO

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from