Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JANUARY 2023

Using Domestically Sourced Recycled Content? Look Beyond The Recycling Process Before Claiming It's "Made In USA"

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Contributor
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

About Kelley Drye We’re focused—in key areas of the law and on the nuances of each matter—to help...

View firm profile
Explore more from Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

We periodically stumble across older FTC investigations that have new relevance, and post about them as reminders. That happened recently as we get more questions about the use of recycled content...

United StatesConsumer Protection

We periodically stumble across older FTC investigations that have new relevance, and post about them as reminders. That happened recently as we get more questions about the use of recycled content and the desire to tout U.S.-based manufacturing. Although the FTC's Enforcement Policy Statement and regulation regarding Made in USA claims do not mention how to evaluate recycled content, in a 2014 FTC Staff Advisory Opinion the Staff declined to consider the recycling process as a "new life cycle" and disregard the origin of the jewelry returned for recycling.

The requestor acknowledged that jewelry returned for recycling is often of unknown origin, but asserted that significant time and resources go into collecting recyclable material, delivering it to refiners in the United States, and processing it to a purity level of almost 100%, equating this to a "new life cycle" that resets the origin of the recycled material. Consumer perception testing submitted with the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from