Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 NOVEMBER 2014

UDAAP Council Weekly UDAAP Standards Report - 11/19/2014

Every week, courts around the United States issue decisions addressing aspects of civil UDAAP claims.

United StatesConsumer Protection

Every week, courts around the United States issue decisions addressing aspects of civil UDAAP claims.

In an effort to illuminate the UDAAP standards, below is a sampling of some of this week's UDAAP decisions on the meaning of unfair, deceptive, and abusive.

Deceptive

  • A debt collector that failed to identify itself in voice messages left for the plaintiff violated Section 1692e(11) of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, even though the plaintiff allegedly was aware that the calls were from a debt collector. Erez v. Steur, United States District Court for the Western District of Washington.
  • A debtor stated a claim under Section 1692e of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act when she alleged that a debt collector sent her letters indicating that she should send payments by mail when the collector was already debiting payments form her account, since such statements could confuse consumers. Coover v. Immediate Credit Recovery, Inc., United States District

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from