Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JUNE 2018

T.H. V. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

T.H. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. represents a significant departure from established product liability and innovator liability law.

United StatesConsumer Protection

WHY IT MADE THE LIST

T.H. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.1 represents a significant departure from established product liability and innovator liability law. The case tackles two high- stakes theories of liability for brand-name manufacturers of pharmaceutical products:

(1) whether they can be liable for injuries caused by a generic manufacturer's drug; and (2) whether that liability extends after the brand-name manufacturer transfers rights to the product and no longer makes or sells it. Nearly every court that has addressed these theories has rejected them. In T.H., the California Supreme Court charted a different course. It held that a brand-name manufacturer can be liable for failure to update a label even when the plaintiffs used a generic version of the product, years after the brand-name manufacturer last held rights to it.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from